<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Globalization Defined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wuyibing.com/129/globalization-defined.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wuyibing.com/129/globalization-defined.html</link>
	<description>Reviews, Notes, Journals and Comments</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tara McMurtrie</title>
		<link>http://wuyibing.com/129/globalization-defined.html#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara McMurtrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wuyibing.com/129/globalization-defined.html#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>Interesting point -- but the question you pose isn't a real choice.  Globalization as we now see it - benefits the wealthy compatriot and a small number of wealthy elite foreignors.  I don't get to choose a globalization that benefits the poor anywhere.  Having compassion for people all around the world - makes me human -- not a globalizationist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point &#8212; but the question you pose isn&#8217;t a real choice.  Globalization as we now see it - benefits the wealthy compatriot and a small number of wealthy elite foreignors.  I don&#8217;t get to choose a globalization that benefits the poor anywhere.  Having compassion for people all around the world - makes me human &#8212; not a globalizationist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
