Archive for the 'China' Category

Jan 14 2010

A Letter to an Old Acquaintance

Published by Forager under China, censorship

Guo Liang

I read the following on the New York Times -

Guo Liang, the director of the China Internet Project at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said he thought Google’s accusations were little more than public whining. “Google may use politics as its excuse, which is easy for Westerners to accept, but in essence this is just a business failure,” he said. “If I were the government, I wouldn’t even bother to respond.”

If the reporter didn’t quote you out of context, I have to say I strongly disagree with your stance. You may question Google’s ulterior motive, that is your prerogative. But if you just look at the matter at its own merit, whatever the Party-State has been doing cannot be justified. You may dismiss us as outsiders not in tune with reality in China. But reasonable people disagree. In this case, you also need to ask whether your reality is THE reality or whether outsiders’ opinion are naturally irrelevant just because they are outsiders.

In the end, what goes around, comes around. The limit of information flow in the name of “stability and harmony” will backfire. To me, information freedom is not as much about some abstract ideal as about dollars and senses. A billion people with “little smart” (小聪明) is, in the end, a billion brains wasted. If you think the creative ways Chinese are making money now is the same as innovation, I am afraid you are terribly mistaken and sourly missing the point. If Chinese citizens are trained only to think as they are allowed to but no more, what you end of having is “involution”–a term historians used to describe the late Qing China.

Bing

No responses yet

Sep 30 2009

On the Sixtieth National Day

Published by Forager under China, economy

It is a day of mixed feelings. On the one hand, China is truly a great country today. On the other, it is not the China I wished it is.

Every great nation in the history can point to a legendary past and say: that is what made us who we are. For the British, it was the birth of liberal capitalism, For the French, the French Revolution. The Americans, the first constitution in human history. Even Taiwan can say it was the first that transitioned from a dictatorship to democracy without bloodshed.

Modern China is identified with phenomenal economic growth that resulted in the improvement of a billion life in the shortest period in history. One may argue that some others, like the Germans and the Japanese, all went through industrialization quickly. Impressive as their respective history may be, the scale is still quite far apart.

At the same time, today’s China is also painfully lack of humanity. Not to say Chinese are innately lack of sympathy or empathy. Rather, one just don’t see organic growth of communities based on trust and reciprocity. As the country grow richer, instead of seeing more vibrant civic life, it is constantly flirting with a Hobbesian model: people don’t trust each other but are willingly submit to a Leviathan.

I have been following economic news in China. What I don’t understand is how China can develop so quickly without incurring some kind of severe financial crisis. There were small tremors, like the real estate bubble in Hainan in the late 80s. But nothing as debilitating as the Asian Financial Crisis or the Russian default in the late 90s. Even Hong Kong, where credit market is largely self-regulated, is spared.

None of the above (getting richer and more authoritarian, having spectacular growth but no bubbles, or inflation, or devaluation) makes sense to me. The same puzzle that haunted DS too I believe. If Americans can point to their greatness as evidence of “American Exceptionalism”, isn’t the Chinese experiment qualified for no less a grand claim? No to glorify China, but I just find the word “Exception” very disturbing.

But I still believe that China is heading toward a Crisis. Unlike the financial crisis in here, when the Crisis hits China, it will be as much social as economic. My arguments are, the Chinese economy is not efficient. Capital is very poorly deployed in an unbalanced industrial structure. The social fabric is fragile and the country is hold together by a blind faith in the future.

To be fair, not having the most efficient economy is not a predicament in itself. In fact, it is an opportunity. It depends on whether the incentive is for the capitalist to invest in long term efforts to improve the economy, or to exploit whatever short term gain there is at the expense of structural change.

I firmly believe the current political and economic environment inevitably lead capitalists (or every homo economicus) to choose the latter, so much so that those who made the other choice are only to prolong the arrival of the Crisis–which makes whatever lesson from the Crisis even harder to crystallize itself.

I understand that the $400 billion stimulus package is not likely to trigger massive inflation nationwide (although very likely regionally), because China still has excess labor that will absorb excess capital. In fact, as long as China has high unemployment or underemployment rate, spending won’t automatically trigger inflation.

China’s perfect storms will only arrive when natural resources become an issue, when worldwide commodity price rise quickly. Then, inflation, unemployment, and social inequity will mix together to be very explosive. In fact, before the credit crisis hit, China was heading down this path and the leadership was very concerned.  To them, the economic crisis was a gift from heaven.

But my guess is still that: a Crisis is coming. When it hits China, it will hit it very hard.

No responses yet

Jul 17 2009

My Thoughts on Wokai

Published by Forager under China

After volunteering for Wokai for a while, I thought I could finally write something.

Casey asked me whether I could merge my mfi-china blog with Wokai’s main blog, I said yes. But it took me a while to decide to still keep mine going, as a separate blog–even just a carbon copy.

Here is what I said there -

At the request of Casey, I am going to post directly to Wokai’s blog site. However, I am leaning towards keeping a copy of my posts on this blog.

As of now, Wokai’s blog entry doesn’t carry a byline. I am not sure why. Not that I care for the credit as much as I want to have my own “brand”: I am a volunteer of Wokai and I care about Microfinance in China. Yet I don’t represent Wokai.

My attitude toward Wokai is complicated. Wokai is an ambitious grassroots organization started by two young social entrepreneurs (now mostly just Casey). It certainly identifies a niche–microfinance in China through foreign funding. The fact that it still exists today, given the limited resources it started with, is a strong testament of a need for such an organization.

However, Wokai, as MF in China in general, is struggling to have its voice heard, due largely to an economy that is used to state intervention–those who think China is the ultimate success story of unbridled entrepreneurship don’t know China at all. Even worse, such an economy–however unbalanced or exhaustive–is still doing wonders. As a result, such a development model crowds out other alternatives, such as grassroots financial self-help. I wouldn’t be surprised that having heard others’ success stories, even the poorest farmers in the farthest corner still pin their hopes mostly on the government.

In this context, it is difficult for an organization like Wokai to gain traction, let along to expand. One critical issue is the lack of operational resource. We have a young founder who is working overtime, without pay, and has to rely on volunteers’ good faith to get anything done.

But volunteers come and go. More than once, I have seen new volunteers joining Wokai with high hopes only to fade away months later. I myself am struggling to stay committed. But it is not because all the volunteers are hot-headed dreamers. Personally, I believe in microfinance, I believe that to many who want to “make it”, to start is the hardest part. And credit is the biggest problem at that stage. Every bit of money helps. But compared to aid or subsidy, microfinance is about forging a social bond, is about the difference between a outsider and a participant.

In other words, I can see the logic, I can envision the end. But because of lack of operational fund, I do not see the results. Without results, there is a lack of sense of achievement. Without a sense of achievement, it is difficult to keep the troop marching, so to speak.

This is a long story to explain why I decided, despite the lack of time, to keep two sites for the same topic.

No responses yet

Next »