Archive for the 'people' Category

May 24 2009

Fireflies in a Bottle III

Published by Forager under economy, people

Growing Sour on Bernanke

I used to think of Bernanke as a a monetary conservative because he was said to be in favor of fixing inflation within the 2% range. Looking back, this was perhaps wishful thinking. After all, Bernanke made his name in arguing that the Fed was too conservative at the onset of the Great Depression. That part of history may have shaped his earlier thoughts more than anything else.

The New Yorker profile on him, in the Dec. 1, 2008 issue, portrays a loyal Greenspanian:

  • “He wouldn’t have gotten into that club if he didn’t go along … Mr. Greenspan ran a tight ship”
  • “Bernanke provided the intellectual justification for the Fed’s hands-off approach to asset bubbles” by developing the “global savings glut” (aka blaming the Asians) theory.
  • When challenged by critics on the potential of a housing bubble, Bernanke reacted coolly: “really believes that it is impossible to lean against the wind on the way up and that it is possible to clean up the mess afterwards,”
  • When he was appointed to the Fed Chairmanship, he stated his first priority would be “to maintain continuity with the policies and policy strategies (i.e. monetary philosophy?) … established during the Greenspan years”

In terms of the people I love to hate in the last eight years, Greenspan comes second only to Dick Cheney. Most people fail to realize what an ideologue he is, or the cost he has brought upon the nation for pursuing a personal belief formed in Ayn Rand’s reading room.  Ayn Rand may be a gifted writer, but she’s not someone should be entrusted with secular affairs. She lived through her formative years as a Jew in the Soviet Russia, then escaped to the U.S. and developed a fetish love with a fantasy Capitalism. She once said that she got sexually aroused by the sight of skyscrapers. To think our central bank was run by her Milhouse Van Houten for decades really makes me sick to the gut.

Just saw Richard Posner’s scathing criticism of Greenspan, A Failure of Capitalism: Reply to Alan Greenspan, which went after Greenspan’s self-defense article by article.  Lately, Greenspan has been using the “global economy making central bank less powerful” argument (which is exactly what Bernanke’s global glut refers to). Posner was sharp in his pursuit: the Fed is still relevant and we delegated Greenspan enormous power to keep the Fed relevant.

Another example -

He notes the dot-com stock market bubble of the late 1990s and explains that the Fed did not try to puncture it by raising interest rates, fearing that to do so would cause “a substantial economic contraction and possible financial destabilization.” But the article does not explain why he thought those consequences would have ensued.

Isn’t this a case of an ideologue carry out his plot while hiding behind technical smoke screen? Hurry Reid once called Greenspan the “biggest political hack in Washington”. Posner’s pointers are good footnotes.

Self-control, Ability to Suppress, Career Achievement

Jan 12, 2009

Keywords: child development, child psychology, focus suppression, the “marshmallow experiment”, correlation to adulthood achievement. Massive MRI scan on original subjects now in adulthood, trying to identify biological origin of the power of self-control.

Thoughts: Dan Turner’s experiment on watching video with a Gorilla man. Being able to focus, etc.

Adam Kirsch on Hannah Arendt

Same issue.

In reporting the Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem, Arendt must have said something that is pretty upsetting to her fellow Jews.  However, whereas Samantha Powers glossed over this in a couple of sentences (in her Forward in the latest edition of The Origins of Totalitarianism), Kirsch wrote 10 pages on the New Yorker to reveal a deeper psych that could have produced such coldness to her own people.

In short, his conclusion is Arendt is less a Jew-hater than a German-lover. She drunk the Kool-Aid of the “Germanese”, epitomized by the work of her teacher-lover, Martin Heiddegger. So much so that she couldn’t overcome her own reasoning on what it means being Jewish.

To me, the article resonated with my own experience and observation of others who try to be “American” or “Western”. Kirsch paints Arendt’s story in a Shakespearean hue, a tragic play.

No responses yet

Apr 07 2009

学者为什么要有人文精神

Published by Forager under China, epistemology, people

朱子曰,“闲来无事不从容”。我最近却是“闲来万事不从容”。早上突然烦躁地睡不着,披着睡衣在计算机前“上早朝”。

不过看到好的文章,就像找到了一个好的朋友。一句“唉,对了”表达的往往大大多于只是一种同意。

最近一个中国的心理学专家叫孙东东(?!),在和媒体讨论信访问题时,随口说了一句,“对那些老上访专业户,我负责任地说,不说100%吧,至少99%以上精神有问题——都是偏执型精神障碍”

乍一看,照英文说法,我下巴差点掉下来。但仔细看看上下文,他想说的问题不是说不可能存在:

你们可以去调查那些很偏执地上访的 人。他反映的问题实际上都解决了,甚至根本就没有问题。但是他就没完没了地闹,你怎么和他解释都不成。于是舆论开始关注这些人的权利是不是得不到保障,这 实际上是缺少基本的精神卫生知识。

我马上想到最近看到的于建嵘先生对于信访制度的批评。大意是,信访制度是中央和地方政权之间博弈用的一个棋子。它的存在干扰了正常的司法操作,拖延了“以法制代替人治”的进程。我看了觉得特有启发。

信访是不好,是不是因为这个原因,那位孙东东就有情可原了呢?接下来,马上看到了于建嵘对于此事的反应:精神病学专家孙教授的拍脑袋学术。说的太好了:

孙教授应该给我们提供的,是支持他观点的事实依据,包括老上访专业户的定义、调查样本的数量、范围,调查人员的背景,以及偏执型精神障碍的认定程序和标准、对样本的诊疗记录等等。

于先生可是拿了数据才去批评信访制度。对我来说,这是起码的做学问的态度。可是,最主要的以下一段,说得我身子往后一仰,大叫,“唉,对了!”

这件事也触动了我内心深处长久以来的一个想法。作为常识,现代学科的细致分工和日益专业化,使对世界、社会、现象、事件的认知和解释,出现了多元化的趋 势。各专业内部的术语、理论等,甚至常常是不相容的。打个简单的比方,用现代心理学知识分析代表隐逸文化的陶渊明,大概属于“社会适应不良”,清末、民国 时热血的革命者,似乎是“反社会人格”。技术消解了价值和意义。具体到每个学者,有限的知识背景,使其结论也可能是有限的。肩负重任的专家,更要意识到自 己身上的局限性,以免落入盲人摸象的境地。而更多的社会责任感和人文精神,比如对弱者的同情,可能会帮助专业人士弥补技术的局限,获得更大的视角。

One response so far

Apr 02 2009

A Funny Picture from the G-20

Published by Forager under people

Picture courtesy of the Huffington Post.

Is it just me or others feel the same way–what a strange poster this is?

Seems right out of a Chris Rock monologue: A nigger, a clown, a midget and a Buddha walk into a bar …

3 responses so far

« Prev - Next »