Book: Nations and Nationalism
Ernest Gellner: a philosopher and social anthropologist. Jewish immigrant from Prague to England. Achieved fame by challenging Ludwig Wittgenstein’s linguistic stuff (Ordinary language philosophy).
There are couple of parallel themes in the book:
1. Nationalism as a byproduct and precondition of industrialization.
2. Nationalism most visibly manifested in colonized 3rd world countries.
3. Nationalism is not an ideology nor is it built on cultural heritage.
“Nationalism is not the awakening of an old, latent, dormant force, though that is how it does indeed present itself. It is in reality the consequence of a new form of social organization, based on deeply internalized, education0dependent high cultures, each prodtected by its own sate. It uses some of the pre-existent cultures, generally transforming them in the process …”
Comments:
1. On nationalism and culture. He separates culture as high (literary) culture and folk culture. The former is what links industrialization and nationalism. The latter is what nationalism uses for disguise and legitimacy. Bend on proving culture is not a real foundation of nationalism. However, sometimes contradicting with himself throughout the book: “admittedly” culture was used to form nation, culture distance was used to counter economic exploitation, etc.
2. On nationalism and industrialization. He breaks world history down to three stages and constantly barks against Marx. But the whole nationalism and industrialization study can be said to prove the super-structure theory. So is the way to view history according to productive methods.
3. Full of sparks of good ideas, insightful commentaries. However, very superficial case studies or strictly comparative data: as if they are irrelevant to philosophers?
Notes:
Theme 2: The nationalism is a theory of political legitimacy, which requires that ethnic boundaries should not cut across political ones.
nationalist sentiment and movement p1
colonialism and nationalism p1
nationalism and state and power p4
nation as one’s shadow p6
Having a nation is not an inherent attribute of humanity but it has now come to appear as such. p6
(Is ETA a form of nationalism? Kurds? The same movement without a state?)
literacy as cultural and cognitive storage and centralization p8
Theme 1: cultural differentiation vs. homogeneity during agrarian society p10
(Are there instances during agrarian society where territorial unity overrides class/caste?
e.g. Vietnam vs. China, S. American Kryolas)
Theme 1: (during agraian times) Culture expand horiztonally across classes but not boundries, no imperialism. p12 (interesting)
(describing agr. societies, like China) a central dominant authority co-exists with semi-autonomous local units p13
Greek: pan-Hellenism is not political? Not the same as facism slogan (p14 what the heck is that?)
Four deminsions of agrarian rulers p14
Theme 1: literacy as the necessary pre-condition of nationalism p17
nationalism as the product of industrialization, social transformation p17
Mamluk: putting the obligations to his calling above the claims of kinship p18
(I guess what he’s trying to say is industrialization expanded people’s community, produced educated professionals, etc. But doesn’t kinship is what ethnic nationalism is all about?)
Like B Anderson, he talks about the vernacularization of language:
No more coded words, meanings, access to all, etc.
The hemogenization of industrialization (not sub-world, culture, language, etc.) p21
The breakdown of taboos/premises (packaged-deal=isolated social groups, Hume and Kant=the anonymous and equal collectivities of men in a mass society) p22
Inquiry must not be bound by the natural affinities and liaisons of things, built into this or that vision …
Industrial society .. favored mode of social oontrol is universal Danegeld, buying off social aggression with material enhancement; its greatest weakness is its inability to survive any temporary reduction of the socal bribery fund. p22
Theme 1: modern generic training vs. agr. one-on-one specialized training (apprenticeship?)
egalitarianism and mobility (Modern society is not mobile because it is egalitarian; it is egalitarian because it is mobile) p25
modern states is akin to a modern army: generic training vs. specialized training. p28
social structure changes => no more direct intimate transmission of special skills. p29
centralized education as a precursor of nationalism p34
Theme 1:
The roots of nationalism in the structual requirements of industrial society are very deep indeed. p35
(Enough universality, where is the exclusiveness that is in nationalism?)
Theme 1:
Nationalism=homogeneity p39
Education in modern society and state p34: At the base o fhte modern social order stands not the executioner but the professor.
Monopoly of violence is replaced by monopoly of education
Nationalism shallow in human psychy (what is it?) but deep in industrial society’s *structural* requirement! p35
Theme 1: p40-42
Industrializaton and religion (Reformation), division of labor, colonialism and imperialism
The … English gained and lost their Empire in a state of absence of mind. p42
It is the objective need (industrialization) for homegeneity which is reflectd in nationalism. p46
Theme 3: p45 implies every language could be used for bases of an strand of nationalism.
Critics of nationalism who denounce the political movement but tacitly accept the existence of nationas, do not go far enough.
Theme 2: Nationalism … when it may be severely secular, can be profoundly distoring and deceptive (like religion as implied a sentence earlier p56-57) Nationalism as the “local high culture”
Theme 3 and 1: p62, But the cultural/linuistic distance and capacity to differentiate themselves from others, can be and often is eventually a positive advantage for entire collectivities.
Theme 2: p94: Typology of Nationalisms chart.
p110: Agrarian socity … is Malthusian … Industrial society is baed and dependent on cognitive and economic growth which in the end both outstrips and discourages further dramatic population growth.
Theme 1, comment 2: The natioanlist state is not the protector only of a culture, but also of a new and often … fargile economy. p112
Theme 3: Industrial culture - one or many? Fears the overriding dominance of high culture (over folk ones) p 114 and on but choose not to “believe it” p118
Theme 1: Nationalism as a phenomenon, not as a doctrine presented by nationalists, is inherent in a certain set of social conditions; and those conditions, it so happens, are the conditions of our time. p125
Power of the media: nationalism is not transmitted through media, but is generated in it. p127
Media as the weaver of emporer’s new cloth:
The most important and persistent message is generated by the medium itself, by the role which such media have acquired in modern life. That core message is that the language and style of the transimissions is important, that only he who can understand them, is included in a moral and economic community. p127
Theme 2: nationalist sentiment is deeply offended by violations of … congruence of state and nation but .. it is most acutely offended by ethnic divergence b/w rulers and ruled. p134