Mar 16 2009
The Discussion on Earmarks on Diane Rhem Show
I was just arguing for Diane yesterday and said, given my age and knowledge of American political system (and how easily it is to find about anything I like to know), “rarely has any one brought more significant marginal increase to what I know than Diane does.” And here is an good example today.
The topic of discussion is “Earmark Reform“. This was a contentious topic during the Presidential Campaign and a rather arcane one too. I knew what it is but didn’t know enough to make up my own mind about the need to reform.
Listening to today’s show changed all that. Diane has the uncanny ability to find the right guests for the right topic: not only are they knowledgeable, but also very articulate. The reform advocate (Melanie Sloan) has a very coherent argument for her cause, but the moderate guy and the status-quo guy are very engaging too. Nobody dismisses the other’s ideas out of hand so that the discussion degenerates into a shouting match. Even though Norman Ornstein appeared exacerbated at the notion of a whole-scale reform, he did a good enough job to make his point across.
After the program, a rather confusing topic now becomes pretty clear to me. I think the most effective and achievable reform at this stage is the continuation of making the process more transparent. I wouldn’t even go as far as publicly tying campaign contributions from earmark recipients (if you remodel your house, would you ask your contractors how much he made from every transactions involved in the project?)
Compared to most other talking heads, particularly those on cable TV, Diane’s program is a fine example of how journalists can keep Democracy the best political system in the world.
Too busy today, may add on to the following thoughts:
The problem of New York Times: the castrated ms media leader who would rather go after individual politicians than to challenge interest groups–whether it is Israel Lobby or Labor Unions; the unachieveable goal of “fair and balanced” reporting by any commercial enterprise; the critique of mainstream media in digital age in the New Yorker by A. Huffington; the power-hungry beasts like Politico and cable news and their impact to political discourse; and again, hallelujah to Diane!!